|
|
 |
|
|
A Critical Analysis of John Hospers’ “Argument Against Skepticism”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following document can be e-mailed to you TODAY! |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[
send me this term paper
] |
|
This is a 5 page report analyzing John Hospers’ “Argument Against Skepticism”. John Hospers’ “Argument Against Skepticism” provides several requirements and conditions for “knowing”: propositions must be true, must be believed to be true and evidence must be available in support of the propositions. The question of evidence remains controversial for the most part as Hospers and critics submit that the degree of evidence must be good enough for those to believe it. “Knowing” is also considered by Hospers to have a “weak” and “strong” sense in which a “weak” sense is used by most people on a daily basis and is based on individuals’ having good reason to belief a proposition is true based on the evidence whereas a “strong” sense of knowing has absolutely conclusive evidence in support of it and is what interests philosophers the most. Hospers’ arguments differ from that of Descartes and also a great deal from the hypotheses presented by the skeptics; Descartes with the concept that knowledge itself proves existence and the skeptics presenting that nothing is known for certain.
Bibliography lists 3 sources.
|
|
Pages:
5
|
|
Filename:D0_TJskept1.rtf |
|
Paper Title:
A Critical Analysis of John Hospers’ “Argument Against Skepticism”
|
|
Is this paper the one?
Click Here to Order It Now
Not sure if this paper is right for you, return back to
|
|
|
If you still can't locate an Essay or Term Paper on your topic,
one of our professional writers can assist you with a Brand New
model Term Paper or Essay written specifically on your topic
as quickly as TODAY! |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|