|
|
 |
|
|
Case 10.1, Power Abuse: Yes or No?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following document can be e-mailed to you TODAY! |
|
Constitutional Law and the Supreme Court research papers
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[
send me this term paper
] |
|
This is a 5 page paper discussing Case 10.1 in regards to officers Andrews and Conn claim against the Philadelphia Police Department. In the case of Andrews and Conn against the Philadelphia Police Department, they have a legitimate claim for sexual discrimination based on their co-workers, and supervisor, being responsible for the creation of an offensive and hostile working environment. Title VII and definitions by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) include the use of lewd language and posting of lewd materials in public working areas as part of a hostile working environment which occurred on many instances in this case as well as many other offensive acts. In addition to the creation of the hostile work environment, the supervisor in the case was aware and did nothing to correct the situation which holds him and his employer accountable for the creation of a hostile work environment. Supervisors, superiors and those in legitimate power positions should implement an Affirmative Action Plan within the workplace and follow this with anti-harassment training for their employees in order to correct discrimination and to prevent future occurrences.
Bibliography lists 3 sources.
|
|
Pages:
5
|
|
Filename:D0_TJCs1011.rtf |
|
Paper Title:
Case 10.1, Power Abuse: Yes or No?
|
|
Is this paper the one?
Click Here to Order It Now
Not sure if this paper is right for you, return back to Constitutional Law and the Supreme Court Paper Search
|
|
|
If you still can't locate an Essay or Term Paper on your topic,
one of our professional writers can assist you with a Brand New
model Term Paper or Essay written specifically on your topic
as quickly as TODAY! |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|