|
|
 |
|
|
Critical Analysis of Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative, in Terms of Lying to Protect a Potential Murder Victim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following document can be e-mailed to you TODAY! |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[
send me this term paper
] |
|
A 4 page paper which critically assesses the validity of Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative, which states that lying is wrong in all circumstances, including to protect a person whose whereabouts are being sought by a murderer. Specifically considered are arguments by Barbara Herman who defends Kant's position, and Christine M. Korsgaard who asserts that lying to a murderer does not violate Kant's first or second Categorical
Imperative formulations. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
|
|
Pages:
4
|
|
Filename:TG15_TGkanlie.wps |
|
Paper Title:
Critical Analysis of Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative, in Terms of Lying to Protect a Potential Murder Victim
|
|
Is this paper the one?
Click Here to Order It Now
Not sure if this paper is right for you, return back to
|
|
|
If you still can't locate an Essay or Term Paper on your topic,
one of our professional writers can assist you with a Brand New
model Term Paper or Essay written specifically on your topic
as quickly as TODAY! |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|