|
|
 |
|
|
Long-Term Functional Benefits Of Forced Use Vs. Traditional Use Of Involved Extremities In Patients With Cerebral Vascular Accidents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following document can be e-mailed to you TODAY! |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
[
send me this term paper
] |
|
8 pages in length. There is much debate within the medical community as to the efficacy of extremity rehabilitation for patients who have suffered a cerebral vascular accident (stroke). While some believe that there is enough scientific evidence to warrant the continued application of rehabilitation techniques, others contend that convincing evidence concerning the therapeutic usefulness of stroke rehabilitation does not yet exist. When the overall consensus is to implement a rehabilitation program, there is still the question of which technique is best: forced or traditional. The writer discusses how proponents of each technique attest to the beneficial outcome of usage; however, there exist a number of variables in making this determination for each individual patient. Bibliography lists 8 sources.
|
|
Pages:
8
|
|
Filename:LM1_TLCcereb.wps |
|
Paper Title:
Long-Term Functional Benefits Of Forced Use Vs. Traditional Use Of Involved Extremities In Patients With Cerebral Vascular Accidents
|
|
Is this paper the one?
Click Here to Order It Now
Not sure if this paper is right for you, return back to
|
|
|
If you still can't locate an Essay or Term Paper on your topic,
one of our professional writers can assist you with a Brand New
model Term Paper or Essay written specifically on your topic
as quickly as TODAY! |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|